

As consumers search for something that feels more human in the continued rise of AI, brands battle between embracing technology while trying to connect more meaningfully with consumers who are tired of algorithms and invasive advertising.
Audiences are becoming adept at switching off or ignoring marketing attempts – especially in the highly saturated digital world, so how can brands win attention in 2026? The answer may lie in more natural storytelling and brand placement, as well as a return to the physical world.
Experts across Asia speak to LBB’s Sunna Coleman on the topic…
Yuichiro Horie, head of planning at TBWA\HAKUHODO
For years, marketers have competed for every imaginable ‘share’: Share of wallet, share of time, share of voice. But 2026 marks the rise of a new battleground: the share of ‘human concentration’.
As AI becomes a universal co-pilot (filtering, summarising, and thinking on our behalf), the amount of time people actively look, listen, and process information will shrink. What remains is not attention as we knew it, but a far narrower, more deliberate form of focus. Concentration becomes a scarce human resource.
For brands, this changes everything. Reach without depth will lose relevance. Impression volume will matter less than the moments that make someone pause – truly pause – and engage with intention.
KPI frameworks will follow. We’ll see a shift from broad metrics like GRPs to measures of
attentive seconds, active consideration, and depth of interaction. The question will move from “did people see it?” to “did people care enough to concentrate?”
In the age of share of concentration, the brands that win won’t be the loudest or most ubiquitous. They will be the ones that design meaning – experiences worthy of a person’s finite, precious focus.
Aarushi Periwal, creative and founding member at Talented
We’re chronically attached to our phones. Scrolling. Complaining about scrolling. Then scrolling to find a meme that explains that. Then scrolling some more. And somewhere in the middle of it, we’ve already rolled our eyes six times because an ad was invasive. Because I didn’t want to be sold a second-hand car, an AI workshop, and yet another copy-paste Black Friday sale, all of which look identical and leave zero imprint. So beyond the obvious AI boom, I think 2026 will be the year of meet-cutes.
Agencies and brands will create things and experiences: a book, a shoe, a vending machine, a physical coupon, a community hike, a direct mailer, a tactile shopping experience, anything less invasive than traditional ads. Things people will actually seek out. Things they’ll remember because they stumbled upon them, because they were drawn in, intrigued, rather than shoved into their algorithm.
And of course, they make for better talking points when someone asks, “What’s up?” and you’re like, “Nothing man, just taking part in a bull run because I’m into crypto.” Like Talented’s event for CoinDCX, a massive hit in a notoriously hard category to break into. I think it stems from a coping mechanism: nostalgia. There was a time when cool shit happened away from our screens, in the real world, and I think we’re all quietly craving more of that.

Dia Kirpalani, VP, head of strategy at Blink Digital
The micro drama (one to two minutes long, high-tension narrative bursts) is emerging as India’s strongest signal for where attention is moving next. The trend isn’t random. It’s the convergence of three forces: algorithmic preference for retention, audience fatigue with AI content which is devoid of real storytelling, and India’s cultural affinity for heightened emotion. When you compress conflict, payoff and relatability into under two minutes, you create the exact type of content the 2026 attention economy will reward.
Across platforms, the pattern is clear. Reels and Shorts are boosting narrative-led formats; creators are shifting from skits to arcs; and micro-series on regional apps are pulling audiences.
Globally, China’s duanju (micro-drama) industry and Korea’s minute-long K-dramas have already proven the model, and India’s cultural wiring and continuing love for saas-bahu dramas makes us an even better fit.
For brands, this is the next efficiency frontier. Micro dramas allow products to sit inside relatable tensions. It’s natural context, not forced insertion. It also unlocks social search, where audiences increasingly discover content through emotional queries like ‘office drama’, ‘couple fight’, ‘mother in law POV’.
In 2026, the battle for Indian audiences' attention will be won by concentrated, high impact resonance driving content, and the micro drama is built for it.
Yuni He, executive producer at P.I.G China
Micro series are firmly in the Chinese mainstream now and continuing to expand in reach. The format originally grew out of a very specific consumption base – people with fragmented leisure time such as shift-based or home-based workers. Because of who was watching and how they were watching (in short, distracted bursts), the early content skewed heavily toward extremely direct, soapy, and melodramatic storytelling with big emotional hooks and fast narrative payoff.
As viewership broadens and diversifies, the content has evolved – stories are more nuanced, less overtly cheesy, while still prioritising pace and clarity. The space has matured into two dominant lanes: contemporary urban narratives (work pressure, ‘lying flat’, modern dating, social mobility) and historical/period dramas, with creators often specialising in one or the other.
Production value has lifted noticeably, but we consistently see a ‘good enough’ ceiling – pushing beyond a certain craft threshold doesn’t yield proportional ROI. The underlying “差不多 (good is enough)” mindset still dominates: adequacy beats benchmark-level polish when speed, volume and emotional engagement matter more than cinematic quality.
Brands have now entered the format as a performance-driven channel, ranging from luxury to QSR and tech (Loewe, Starbucks, KFC, Oppo among many others). The Loewe micro short is an example of best-in-class production and cinematography being applied to the format with heavy resource investment. It made waves among industry insiders and triggered conversations in strategy meetings across the country.
In contrast, Starbucks and KFC decided to go the ‘polished but good enough’ route, with significantly less resource allocation. Oppo's strategy aligned more with the class TVC approach in terms of production quality, focusing more on redacting the content (short, catchy) and format (vertical).
Read more on Asia Advertising Trends 2026 here.